Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JotNot! Scan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  02:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

JotNot! Scan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not convinced this hits WP:NSOFT, as it doesn't ding any of the criteria about historical significance or being taught in schools, etc. I also don't think it meets WP:GNG - the New York Times mention is really just a stubby couple sentences in a listicle about productivity apps, while The Unofficial Apple Weblog doesn't strike me as a reliable source. That leaves two reviews, in Macworld and TechCrunch, which IMO doesn't hit GNG, especially in the absence of any other in-depth product reviews. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom Balle010 (talk) 01:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about the app. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This app has not had enough notability established about it yet.TH1980 (talk) 05:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.