Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 23:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphaned article. Scientific journal without an impact factor. The only listed indexing services are minor. In Biosys Citation Index, there are 318 articles listed as having been published by this journal since 2002; only five articles have been cited more than ten times. At the time of writing, the link to the journal here is currently dead; the journal link here is equally unhelpful. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  17:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Only indexed in BIOSIS Previews, which is only mildly selective. Does not meet WP:NJournals. There is some content in the article history, but it was deleted as being unsourced (so no sources found there either) and, even if everything is correct, that still does not show notability. Hence, does not meet WP:GNG either. --Randykitty (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   19:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NJournals is a low standard and this article does not meet it or other inclusion criteria.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  20:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * DeleteWorldcat shows only 6 library holdings.  DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 15:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.