Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Geek Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Journal of Geek Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

De-PRODded by article creator with reason"This journal is indeed currently not-notable, but it is only in its first number. The journal is, however, gathering an international team of researchers to write articles". Whether this journal will ever become notable is difficult to say without a perfect crystal ball. At this point, even the article creator agrees that there is no notability. No independent sources. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 19:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable as conceded by the article's creator. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  20:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete described as a journal but only a single "issue" published electronically, no indication of any printed format or circulation, not peer review, no notable features that I could see. In short it currently appears just to be a blog. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON, neither well-established enough nor sufficiently covered by independent and selective indexes to pass WP:NJournals. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * SNOWBALL Delete. Gaff (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this is a pretty obvious case of non-notability.  I'm surprised it hasn't been snow closed already.  Looks like it has 19 Google hits.  When it gets coverage in reliable source, it can come back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.