Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Joan of Arc Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies

 * — (View AfD)

This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 2 of 4 sources are it's own materials; 1 is dead; other is useless to prove notablity.  SkierRMH, 09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Jefferson Anderson 17:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, at least until this Journal gains some reputation in the field as a reliable peer-reviewed journal.-- danntm T C 00:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails Notability (books).-- Dakota 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per arguements above & per nom. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * reluctant delete its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. DGG 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Davidpdx 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.