Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Mountaineering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Journal of Mountaineering

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Journal of a state group; published apparently on Yahoo Groups, no evidence for being a separate publication since it is found in no WorldCat libraries, and not included in Ulrich's, and had no ISSN--three very minimal considerations. Note that the title is a common one for similar publications of many regional clubs--some of which actually are in worldCat. Nothing relevant in google etc. DGG (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nominator. -- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  19:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG. I think that since he found something he believes to be so truly deletable as to actually put it up for deletion himself without saying weak delete then we can trust his judgement without hesitation and without the need for further investigation. I see he didn't acutally use the word "delete".  But still. Drawn Some (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * just for your reference, I've deleted over 7500 articles since I've become an admin--. Usually I do it by speedy. If I send them here, it means I think a community opinion is necessary as well. I also can't remember a day at AfD where I do not say delete for several articles.  DGG (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete per nominator. Vicenarian (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the rabid inclusionist nominator, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep the Journal of Mountaineering is pending a trademark. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombcronin (talk • contribs) 20:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC) — Tombcronin (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * That's not an assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Keep ISSN applied for 5/22/09 tombcronin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombcronin (talk • contribs) 21:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't !vote twice, that's no good. ISSN isn't an assertation of notability either, any fool can get one. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment since I see that the sponsoring organization has an article, California Mountaineering Group, but the article does noit have this material, it could be merged appropriately.   DGG (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.