Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Skyscape Archaeology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 16:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Journal of Skyscape Archaeology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another new journal claiming it has notability under "historic purpose" because of it being the only journal covering a certain specialized subject. With one issue published, it's perhaps a wee bit too soon to speak about "historic". PROD reason stand: "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Fails all three criteria at WP:JOURNALCRIT: it doesn't have an impact factor and isn't included in selective databases, per Criterion 1; it's too new to have been frequently cited, per Criterion 2; likewise, it's too new to have had any historic impact, per Criterion 3. The lack of any independent sources makes it fall afoul of WP:GNG, as well. An article might be fitting a few years from now, once the journal has had a chance to make an impact. clpo13(talk) 07:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Randykitty and Clpo13's comments above. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 08:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per above, with a partial move of the main points to some overarching article. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.