Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody seems to explicitly oppose deletion.  Sandstein  12:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, relatively new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

There are more than a few independent sources added. Possibly in wrong category or different stub should be used for such journals?Eplaner (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Normally, the links that you added are routinely removed from articles on academic journals, because they are all rather trivial. As far as I can see, some are to user-contributed databases, others are to not-very-selective databases (DOAJ, Croatian journal portal, etc) or to library catalogs (one -Western Theological Seminary- even simply stating that it is mirroring DOAJ). None of these links show in-depth coverage by an independent reliable source (necessary for GNG) or indexing in a selective database (needed for NJournals; note that not both GNG and NJournals need to be met, either one is sufficient). --Randykitty (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * INSPEC is still not selective enough database?Eplaner (talk) 22:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If it were, I wouldn't have taken this to AfD. No, sorry, it's not a trivial database, but like DOAJ it is not selective enough for NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 09:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to get some more time? I think I could find some better references.Eplaner (talk) 11:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 22:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have seen that someone added that JSDEWES is on SCOPUS now...but with poor reference?Eplaner (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The most recent journal list (linked on this page) lists a "Journal of Sustainable Development" as being discontinued, but it has a different ISSN. The journal being discussed here is not listed. --Randykitty (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Does a number of citations in various scientific papers add up for notability in the field? Eplaner (talk) 10:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.