Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. I found one source (using Google Books) that proves that the subject is encyclopedic. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 01:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure) -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 01:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Journalese

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it is nothing more than a dictionary definition (besides the excess examples) and should be deleted per WP:DICTDEF. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep It can clearly be covered in an encyclopedic fashion - there's books written about it, academic papers, and dozens of articles - and I added a few sentences with 10 minutes's work. Do your WP:BEFORE. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.