Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey to Wild Divine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no arguments for deletion aside from nom JForget  22:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Journey to Wild Divine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No evidence of notability. None of the references mention the game. Fails WP:N, WP:RS andy (talk) 22:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC) http://mm-werkstatt.informatik.uni-augsburg.de/files/publications/115/EmoteToWin.pdf
 * Keep Macworld review, Just Adventure review, very short but usable PCMag piece, Discover magazine piece, small section in a Forbes article, Wired magazine. That's without fine-tooth combing book sources, this is clearly notable. Someoneanother 06:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Someoneanother 06:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: There's a whole pile of academic journal references too.

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1297287

http://weblearn.newcastle.edu.au/Resources/Research%20Centres/SORTI/Journals/AJEDP/Vol%208/v8-amon-campbell.pdf

http://134.148.4.164/Resources/Research%20Centres/SORTI/Journals/AJEDP/Vol%209/v9-Wright-Conlon.pdf

The list goes on and on...Google Scholar matches run into triple figures, and most of them look usable. Highly notable. K2709 (talk) 10:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep – Sources look pretty good and easily pass for notability. –MuZemike 23:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.