Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy-Bangla Keyboard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Joy-Bangla Keyboard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I came across this as an A7 article, but since this is a piece of software it technically doesn't qualify for an A7 deletion and it doesn't really fall under any of the other criteria.

A search doesn't really show where this software is ultimately notable enough to merit an article at this point in time. Unless there are foreign language sources out there in RS, this seems to pretty solidly fail notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability, at least in English language sources. It would be helpful if someone who reads Bengali did a search of Bengali sources, as that appears to be where this originated from. This is a pretty blatant attempt to get around the repeated A7 deletion of the author's autobiography. ~ RobTalk 06:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Non-notable software, only references are Facebook and Linkedin. This article fails WP:GNG, WP:SOFT.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * This doesn't really fit any of the criteria since A7 only covers web content (websites, podcasts, and that sort) and software isn't really considered to be web content. It's not promotional enough to speedy and it's not copyvio, so it doesn't really fall under the various criteria, otherwise I'd have speedied it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister   talk  23:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. As above, social networking sites are not RS. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.