Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy F. Evans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Joy F. Evans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC. Source searches are providing absolutely no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and hardly any coverage at all. The article is entirely reliant upon primary sources, which do not establish notability. North America1000 22:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * This article should not be deleted. At a minimum it should be merged with the article on her husband.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG, there is no evidence she is noteworthy or of public interest and the three sources cited - of her her website obituary and church newsletters - do not support he notion she warrants inclusion in an encyclopedia Pupsbunch (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an inherently notable position, lack of substantive independent sources. Reywas92Talk 05:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage independent of the religious organizations in which she served. Appropriately sourced content from this article (or anywhere else) having bearing on her husband's biography can be included in his article, but a merge would be inappropriate. As a side note, her husband's article has been tagged as potentially failing WP:BIO, so this may soon be moot. Lagrange613 10:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.