Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Ghosh (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that there are insufficient independent reliable sources. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Joy Ghosh (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable businessman TheLongTone (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is not notable. The sources are all of a promotional press-release type and he is just a name in a list within them.Jacona (talk) 20:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  |  23:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  |  23:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  |  23:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The page has many references from credible sources, like newspapers and independent websites. Most of the references are not press releases at all rather they are independent press coverage. The subject is notable as there are many old credible links from newspapers if Google search is done. The page should not be deleted, rather a advice can solve the issue. It is a short biography and under start category, it is not advertisement but the page tells about a individual with references. The page must not be deleted. Wikicontri1968 (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Google search throws credible results, can be considered for keep. The references are less but are credible and belongs to the journals and e-newspapers of the financial industry. Premieredit (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC) — User:Premieredit (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Non-notable individual. Written more like a promotion. I should point out that Wikicontri1968 is the major contributor of this article which he/she has failed to mention. Not that they are discouraged from contributing but it should be open. Premieredit also has close ties to the subject shown by their edit history. Cowlibob (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Further Comment On inspection of the references in this article, all directly or indirectly gain their information from press releases by Exhilway which are of course unreliable as it's not independent. Cowlibob (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Yes, we are the major contributor and I have referred it to all editors via their talk page. I agree the page for Joy Ghosh has lesser references and I have admitted it, but what I believe is whatever information is there is credible. It is not all press releases which is a part of it, since he is one of the contributor in the company he lacks some exclusive information, but is well considering since as the fund manager he is contributing majorly in his arena. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicontri1968 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck out keep as user has already made one "vote". Cowlibob (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable enough. Has very few coverages which does not show he has individually achieved anything. Wannabeeditor6 (talk) 08:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quotes in his company's press releases are about all there is. Not notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.