Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Ride (Swiss film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Joy Ride (Swiss film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

No evidence of notability other than a single German-language review (linked in the "External links" section), which is insufficient per WP:NF. Google search for "Joy Ride" and "Martin Rengell" does not yield much. Possible notability for the real-life incident upon which the film is based (I've not looked), but if that's the case then it should have it's own article. PC78 (talk) 13:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:26, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I guess being a Dogme 95 film isn't enough on its own?  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Why would it be? PC78 (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe I've found enough to improve and source the article. On it now. Will report back when have done so.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per coverage in non-English sources. Request additional input with sourcing from European Wikipedians.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with MichaelQSchmidt. Highest Heights (talk) 05:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Now sources have been found - good work MichaelQSchmidt!  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidence of notability has been found.  D r e a m Focus  01:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.