Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Silverman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sol Wachtler. Tone 07:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Joy Silverman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is not significant on its own. No substantial coverage. Also, the page is clearly negative in its tone beyond the point it can be edited. I would have tagged it with G10, but DGG thought it needs discussion. Dievans (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, tentatively. I declined a speedy on the basis that she has political importance, and the figures she has been involved with are important enough that she will remain of historical importance , and the negative information is therefore appropriate--and also very reliably documented). But I leave this to the community.  DGG ( talk ) 15:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect. It seems clear that all sources discuss her in relation to her affair with Wachtler. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 15:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect per Roscelese. The only reference not about Wachtler is a tiny squib from 1990 that would never amount to political notability. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect per above. --SalmanZ (talk) 22:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The full bio, especially the details about her connections to Bush 41, would not fit in any other article. Subject is notable enough for a standalone article based on national-level coverage. StonyBrook (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.