Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy Silverman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —&thinsp; J 947  (user &#124; cont &#124; ess), at 06:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Joy Silverman
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another recreation a few months later of an article that was deemed a 'REDIRECT' per deletion discussion. No significant coverage about Silverman, only in the context of her relationship with Wachtler. 217.150.87.242 (talk) 22:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Silverman was a top Republican bundler, one of the early ambassadors appointed because of their fund-raising efforts, was a victim in one of the largest scandals in the US involving the sitting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York, and later was national spokesperson for the National Center for Victims of Crime talking about her experiences.Patapsco913 (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep a well sourced article about a notable politician/fundraiser. Could use some trimming. Lightburst (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep it is not true the article is dedicated to relationship to Wachtler. It covers her fundraising and embassadorial nomination by Bush. Quite a notable person. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Patapsco913: passes WP:ANYBIO. ——  SN  54129  18:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:ANYBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, WP:THREE are already cited in the article:  . Significant role in a significant event takes it out of WP:BLP1E, and I agree that there is also notability from the ambassadorial nomination and her philanthropy. This might be a WP:SNOW candidate. Levivich&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 19:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Previous Afd was not a perfect close since besides for keep, some supported merge/redirect when all that happened was redirect. StonyBrook (talk) 20:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.