Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joyce Bender


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep --Mike Cline (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Joyce Bender

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

OTRS confirmation now provided for info which previously had copyright concerns, so removed the speedy tag. Procedural nomination, no personal opinion on notability of the page itself. -- Cirt (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - per references. establishing notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A Google News search for "joyce bender disabled" produces many newspaper articles over many years. Though most are in the Pittsburgh area where she's based, I also find references in Chicago and Colorado, as well as at CNN.  A lot of these are paid sites (though of reliable newspaper sources) and in those cases I couldn't read the full reference but enough are fully visible to confirm notability, in my mind, without a doubt.  Simply adding the word "disabled" in the search separated the wheat from the chaff, and gave a picture from reliable sources of this person's notability. Cullen328 (talk) 04:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.