Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joyce Burditt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems a firm consensus that her notable work (in its various forms) and the coverage of it satisfies WP:AUTHOR, with the addition of more suitable sourcing. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Joyce Burditt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Of the references, one mentions the subject only in passing, the other appears to be promo piece about their speaking event, the last being an interview, not constituting coverage about the subject, but from them. A preliminary WP:BEFORE didn't unearth much more. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  16:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - First ref confirmed key role in long-running popular series and the last one was a long interview in People which also shows notability, but only sourcing uncontroversial personal info. Added a couple more sources, but many more available. Should have been a Refimprove. StrayBolt (talk) 19:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Verifiably played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work covered in multiple independent newspaper/periodical reviews, so seems to pass WP:AUTHOR. Bakazaka (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Her book was a best seller and made into a movie so she passes WP:Author JC7V  -constructive zone  04:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per "created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work" from WP:AUTHOR. Pam  D  08:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW Keep, several soruces were added during discussion.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.