Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozef Kovalík


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Jozef Kovalík

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:NTENNIS - no ATP Challenger titles, no ATP World Tour main draw matches played in, no Davis Cup matches played in, never a top three ITF Junior ranking, no ITF Junior Grand Slam titles won Mayumashu (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I also could find no sources giving him notability. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - All I can find is a lost final in challenger tour doubles. That doesn't satisfy NTENNIS. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Why relist this, twice at that? - three contributors have said that he fails notability and no one has commented to the contrary Mayumashu (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NTENNIS. Also, in reply to comment above, three is not really enough for "consensus" in a lot of people's opinions. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 14:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.