Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Burton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 04:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Juan Burton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Display persons values, important achievements Learn More About Me and What I Do! 09:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Despite telling us how fantastic he is at every field he enters, the article does not explain why he is notable. No reference whatsoever. This self-promotional article fails WP:BIO.-- Lester  12:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Great self-promotion and also self-nomination for deletion as the creator of the article is the same editor that created this deletion discussion. No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability.   GB  fan  13:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Oy vey. Dude was born in 1983, but is a self-proclaimed American Business Tycoon. Definition, is a Self-Proclaimed Extraordinaire Entrepreneur, Business Developer (Internet & Brick and Mortar), American Business, Merchandising, Genius, Mastermind, Whiz Kid, Guru, Artist, Song Writer, Author, Producer, Actor, Director, Model, Inventor, Technology Engineer, Mechanical Design Engineer & Software Engineer, Video Game Designer & Creator, Listener, Learner, Leader and Overall Go-Getter. Is the Speedy Deletion machine broken or something? Carrite (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion would inevitably get rejected on the grounds that there are "claims of notability". Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - G11. If one were to strip the self-promotion from the article there would be a collection of category links and nothing more. --Talain (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. On the edge of spam, no sign of notability whatsoever. As to notable acting, apparently he even wrote his own biography at imdb (so much for the reliability of that source in general). And GB fan has a good point there about the self-nomination. We should do the author the favour and apply CSD G7. De728631 (talk) 23:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as a complete violation of WP:V. Reading that article did take me back to the days of WP:BJAODN, though... ah, such fond memories. -- Kinu t /c  01:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as over-whelming and over-reaching self promotion. In looking at the offered sources, we have IMDB, SPS, and press releases. Were this indiviual as notable as claimed, we'd have piles of reliable sources and might then consider a major re-write for style. But as a BLP, its sourcing fails miserably.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 15:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.