Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan E. González


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Juan E. González

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any indication of notability. Natureium (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller!  (distænt write)  21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment He doesn't have a GS profile, but counting manually, I get his h-index as 26, just a bit higher than the one that SCOPUS computes &mdash; they put him at 24. This isn't the most slam-dunk pass of WP:PROF that I've ever seen, but it's arguable. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per XOR&#39;easter's findings.--IndyNotes (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per XOR&#39;easter's assessment. González's works have an impact in his field as shown in the citation rates in Google Scholars. Thsmi002 (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.