Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Gérvas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Juan Gérvas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article. This doctor has no relevant research or career beyond a regular medical practitioning. Now he has published a book and he or some related person is trying to promote him in wikipedia in several languages. Fjsalguero (talk) 18:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Should an admin delete the article or may I mark it for speedy deletion by myself?--Fjsalguero (talk) 12:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I've declined your speedy deletion, as this debate was never listed at WP:AFD. So I'm going to relist it and start the seven days. At the end of that seven days, if there's consensus to delete, it'll be deleted. No one contested the deletion because no one saw it - that's why we have the AFD list. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and stubbify Weak notability per 1, 2, 3, 4. Dea  db  eef  23:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Cites on GS probably satisfy WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete - Fails notability. Lacks any references, and appears to be nothing more then a resume/CV for a doctor. Caffeyw (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I proposed the deletion because, as Caffeyw pointed, it's nothing more than a CV. Gervas is now promoting himself as a book writer and as conferencer, that's why he had some interviews in some blogs and newspaper. I don't think wikipedia should be used to promote himself. The article was writen by a collaborator of Gervas.--Fjsalguero (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You're already listed as recommending delete because you were the original nominator. I've struck the notation just to avoid confusion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't sure if I had to vote independently or not.--Fjsalguero (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 03:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  01:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: No comments since the second relisting.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fjsalguero (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unreferenced article without a claim of notability. Google scholar citations are not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. Media material by him (e.g. interviews) does not make up for the lack of material about him. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.