Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Macapagal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Juan Macapagal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Dubious source. WP:MADEUP User234 (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Then flag the source as dubious. One person saying it doesn't exist in the Philippines National Archives is not enough to get me to support deleting that article.  - BalthCat (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Maybe speedy, as BalthCat notes, this is not a serious reason for deletion. One glance at the gbooks results shows the existence of a quite notable 17th century figure of that name, with previews verifying claims in the article.John Z (talk) 07:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:V is met by such as     and the like.  Collect (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.