Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Manuel Puig Carreón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 15:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Juan Manuel Puig Carreón

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

MMA fighter that fails WP:NMMA because he's had only 1 top tier fight (a first round KO loss). Jakejr (talk) 02:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 03:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 03:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 03:04, 9 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator. Would not be against new subjects having only one of the three top tier fights required for WP:MMANOT but it would have to be recently active and a win.  This single fight was a loss.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Even so, the fighter is notable in the US (ie California), and Mexico City. Probably of interest to Hispanic readers. Strawberrie Fields (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Strawberrie Fields was created on 8 August 2014.Forbidden User (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:NMMA and coverage is routine sports reporting. I don't see any WP policy supported reasons to keep this article, but I have no objection to its recreation after he has 3 top tier fights. Papaursa (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:52, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep As above. J 1982 (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin has made a spree of 23 identical keep as above !votes in 29 minutes. LibStar (talk) 12:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * "Probably of interest to Hispanic readers" is not a valid reason to keep an article. Papaursa (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * delete only one top tier fight does not meet the notability standard. LibStar (talk) 13:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 14:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.