Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanita Broaddrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Juanita Broaddrick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I feel like this is a rather straightforward case of WP:BLP1E, as she seems to be only notable for allegedly being raped by Bill Clinton. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 13:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The subject, or specifically her allegations, have received significant coverage in a wide variety of reliable sources to the present day. On par with Kathleen Willey, the content is a legitimate fork of Sexual misconduct allegations against Bill Clinton. To me, one question is whether we should name the article after her or after the event (i.e. the allegations she made). I'm OK with keeping it as named given that, per BLP1E, the event (i.e.allegations) was significant and she was central to that event. - Location (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - it needs a lot more editing, but it's not so bad as to require WP:TNT. FWIW, I voted twice for Bill, before I was aware of the allegations, and am a supporter of Hillary. Bearian (talk) 19:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - AfD is not a clean-up of a service for articles that needs attention. WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Her name is still popping up in mainstream political RS over twenty years after the fact, even within the last month: ,,[ http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/sexing-texting-with-the-clintons/ ], etc. Has clearly survived the "news cycle". Pax 11:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I think this should be renamed after the notable event, not taking the form of a biography of the otherwise non-notable person who made the charge. Carrite (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - With the upcoming Presidential election and the possibility Hillary may be the democratic nominee her husband's lack of character should continue to be a matter of public importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeRoyDallas (talk • contribs) 00:00, 2 April 2015‎ (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.