Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanito Apinani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Juanito Apinani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a person who fails WP:ANYBIO. Includes a lot of praise. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  21:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Can an etching be a reliable source? see this one Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. the subject of a major painting is likely to be notable. Someone needs to look in the appropriate sources, which are likely to be Spanish newspapers of the period.  DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, but without prejudice to recreation if sources come to light. A WP:BEFORE check turns up nothing, and the article itself is written almost like a tall tale.  The painting itself can be notable, but that doesn't necessarily mean the subject is; it could simply be someone the artist saw do something one day.  That being said, if DGG's suggestion that Spanish newspapers from the 1800s can be found, I'm okay with this being recreated.   Red Phoenix  talk  22:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete And in addition to the previous comment, there is original research ("he became famous..." is not in the source cited) so it fails WP:OR. Doesn't seem to pass notability guidelines entirely, but with more sources it may reveal so. Redditaddict69 08:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.