Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee Christian College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Jubilee Christian College

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unimportant college with merely 200 students. The article is unsourced. Fails WP:N DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC) *Delete - Has no references at all. searches also fail  to  provide the slightest  mention  of the school  within  the definition  of WP:RS. Plenty of entries in  directories  and lists  of private school, but  nothing  that  asserts notability for this for-profit  company. Article reads like a brochure and is therefore also in  possible violation  of WP:ADVERT.--Kudpung (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —StAnselm (talk) 12:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This college lacks any independant, relaible, verifiable thrid party sources. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This school lacks notability as far as I can see, I cannot find any reliable third party sources. As the comment above me says, the article is also written like an advertisment for the school, which may be a violation of WP:ADVERT. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Based on its website this is a K-12 school, not a "college" in the American sense.  I haven't had time to review this in more detail yet. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Arxiloxos (talk) 15:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Despite its name "College," this is actually a K-12 school and is thus notable per se under the official or unofficial mantra, "All High Schools Are Notable." Carrite (talk) 16:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment -- This is at least partly a secondary school (High School). The consensus has developed that all High Schools are notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - contains a high school; the reasons for keeping are at WP:NHS. Sources are available to add to the page. The better way with such articles is to source/expand rather than delete. TerriersFan (talk) 00:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have reluctantly withdrawn my  'delete'  in  deference to   TerriersFan who  has worked hard this year  to  improve, establish, and implement  new policy  that  I  was not  bang  up-to-date on. I still  maintain however that  the original  reasons for the creation of this article were possible advertising, but that's now moot.--Kudpung (talk) 04:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - it exists; it includes a High School levels; thus, it is notable--Shirt58 (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. If it were to be sourced per WP:V and WP:CS/WP:RS, then that part of the article could be kept.  As it is, no sources, no article in Wikipedia. N2e (talk) 00:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.