Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee Garden (Hong Kong)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. A Delete, Keep and Weak Keep are not enough to form a consensus and after three weeks it's time to lower the curtain on this discussion. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Jubilee Garden (Hong Kong)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable per WP:NBUILD viz ✦ 17:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. viz ✦ 17:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. viz ✦ 17:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep Have some WP:GNG passing news coverage regarding the dispute between landlord and the residents who owned the units. The dispute was quite covered in the newspaper (and current affair TV program, if i remember right.) Matthew hk (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, like was decided in similar, simultaneous-running AFDs Articles for deletion/Allway Gardens, Articles for deletion/26 Nathan Road, Articles for deletion/Yoho Town, all about huge housing tower complexes in Hong Kong that are each bigger than many if not most countries in population and whose construction was big enough to noticeably change the world's gravitational field and rotational speed. For this like the others, there are surely sources, if any diligent editor like User:Cunard chooses to go get them by digging through difficult-for-your-average-editor-like-me sources, but since we know that there do exist sources, there's no need to go through that drill.  wp:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP and wp:GEOFEAT (these are not natural features but they are so big they change the weather, effectively are geo features). --Doncram (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 21:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.