Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee House Community


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as a copyvio. No prejudice against recreation in non-copyvio form W.marsh 16:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Jubilee House Community
appears to lack notability. βcommand 04:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment There are a decent number of Google News archive hits. (More than I expected, anyway.) Most of the articles are from NC papers, but there are a few mentions in the Christian Science Monitor. Zagalejo ^ ^  ^  07:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, well, it appears that the text is largely copied from this. Zagalejo ^ ^  ^  07:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.