Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judæo-Aramaic language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. J I P | Talk 17:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Judæo-Aramaic language
Delete? I don't see a Judaeo-English article, and the English Jews use, has been Hebrew-influenced in the say way. As in people say "Shabbat" or "Shabbos" instead of "Sabbath." ems 13:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Solution - merge all 5 subset articles. (Why didn't I think of this before submitting afd?) ems 13:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually there is a Judeo-English Article: It's called Yinglish, just like Judaeo-German is called Yiddish. I'm not sure that many people will have the knowledge to say much about it, but that's not why we delete articles on Wikipedia.
 * Comment - interesting. Added redirects. ems 11:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Against - Leave it alone SF2K1 01:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The real solution here is to expand this article as well as the other 5 articles, which cover daughter languages of the article that this one is supposed to be about.  Tom e rtalk  05:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand.--DieWeibeRose 08:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I am convinced keep the article and expand. ems 11:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * NOTE: vote change by originator of this AfD. Tom e rtalk  12:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Question - Can we call this a keep? or just leave it open and let it run its course?  Tom e rtalk  12:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am not an admin, but so far everyone thinks it should be a keep, include that wacko that submitted this AfD, hehehe. ems 15:03, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep — these are real languages. I wrote the original articles on the different Judaeo-Aramaic languages. They have much in common, but lack overall mutual intelligibility. Combining the articles would be a retrograde step. It is useful to have an article that can direct the reader to the articles on the individual languages, but could also discuss their position. Wikipedia is a work in progress, and it would be careless to kill off something that is in development. This really is not the kind of article that should be submitted to AFD. --Gareth Hughes 21:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.