Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jud Newborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; JL 09  talkcontribs   18:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Jud Newborn

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I see no evidence that this author is notable by Wikipedia's standards. Puffy claims are made about wide-ranging fame as a presenter and credentials as an author, but I have found no proof of that. Drmies (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The Gnews link above seems to have plenty of evidence for a pass of WP:PROF criterion 7 - as an expert anthropologist and Holocaust scholar, and widely quoted in the popular press in that capacity. Ray  Talk 18:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Seems to have plenty of notability per Google News, although many of the major Reliable Source links are behind paywalls. At least one of his books was reviewed by the New York Times. --MelanieN (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article needs some work, but it passes WP:N.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.