Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Hassan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 23:49, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Jude Hassan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Classic BLP1E where the subject has failed to garner sufficient secondary sources to meet GNG/N. Of the two worthwhile sources, one is a paragraph from a purely local sources and the second is about something else. So this fails to meet the GNG and if it did, he is only famous for one this, writing a book. Spartaz Humbug! 14:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Deleteas no reasonable indication of notability. The book is self-published: Mill City Press [www.millcitypress.net/ defines itself] as a self publisher. Not surprisingly, it is in only one library. We have normally said that a self-published book is not a claim to notability for the purpose of CSD A7. Additionally, I think it would be deletable under both G11, promotional, and also as a negative BLP with inadequate sourcing--odd as it may seem to have the two together.  DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 16:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This article seems to be self promotional and could fall under WP:GCSD G11. Its most significant contributors are Judehassan and an IP editor that seems to be located near the residence of the subject of the article. -    &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 22:48, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.