Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude Quinn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation as a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 10:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Jude Quinn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional character in film I'm Not There. Article written in WP:OR sophomoric style. To add material to I'm Not There article would add WP:PLOTBLOAT and WP:UNDUE weight to article. Mick gold (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Much ado about nada. Absolutely no reason to have an article on a single character in a film. Already has a sizable section in the film article. Softlavender (talk) 10:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with the first two posts. WP:NOTESSAY applies as well. If there is anything of value it could be merged to the article for the film. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and rationale above. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and cleanup, as the more targeted sources search seems to show more than adequate RS coverage. Yes, this isn't particularly encyclopedic, and yes, I'm sure the character is already covered in the movie article... but neither of those are deletion reasons, since they can be fixed by regular editing. Jclemens (talk) 21:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I disagree. It's basically a WP:Content fork, which is a reason for deletion. BMK (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge any non-trivial material that's not in the movie article already, then Delete. BMK (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Another fictional character in I'm Not There, Jack Rollins, has already been discussed in Articles for deletion/Jack Rollins (Character). The consensus was: Delete. Mick gold (talk) 08:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the Jack Rollins AfD, not notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 16:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nominator's reasons. Moisejp (talk) 04:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.