Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgement Day (Judge Dredd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 2000 AD (comics). as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Judgement Day (Judge Dredd)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Judge Dredd's storyline, a lenghty plot summary with no reception, footnotes are 100% to the comic book issues. I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Necrothesp with the following rationale " I think this needs to go to AfD" which IMHO is not a helpful rationale, but - let's discuss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Comics and animation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources. WP:BEFORE didn't discover enough WP:SIGCOV, though it's possible there's a redirect or even a merge, if someone can establish at least some reliable coverage. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. It was deprodded by User:Necrothesp with the following rationale "I think this needs to go to AfD" which IMHO is not a helpful rationale... As you very well know, a prodded article can be deprodded by anyone for any reason or none. As you also very well know (or should do), prodding should not be used as an attempt to get around AfD and should never be used if opposition could be reasonably foreseen. I do not consider that this is an article that should simply be deleted without discussion. Prodding is becoming worryingly common on articles for which deletion could clearly be controversial. To reiterate, prodding is for uncontroversial deletion only. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to 2000 AD (comics), which mentions it, as WP:ATD-R. Possible there are some implicitly verifiable items to merge as well. &mdash;siro&chi;o 04:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.