Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgement Yard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Sizzla. Cirt (talk) 08:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Judgement Yard

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This bizarre advert-like article has been tagged for references and notability for almost two months with no substantive changes since thne. There are no claims of notability whatsoever nor any references. Searches for “Judgment Yard” together with “August Town” do not even help to clarify what the topic of this article might have been intended to be. Bongo matic  14:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * My gut instinct is that the subject probably *is* notable. However, the article itself doesn't clearly demonstrate this, and indeed isn't comprehensible enough for anyone who doesn't already know the subject matter to make a fair stab at rewriting it. In such circumstances, isn't the onus on the original article creator to improve the article for notability and comprehensibility or for it to be deleted? It probably needs rewritten from scratch anyway. Ubcule (talk) 15:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete | A7; we have here an article about a real organization that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. Its odd, rambling first-person narrative seems to consist almost wholly of personal essay (original research), and if it doesn't violate CSD G1 (patent nonsense) it comes very, very close. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 16:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete  change to merge per Lockley  Dloh  cierekim  13:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Although the subject is probably notable, the article is incoherent and lacking in a clean version. There is not sufficient context to identify the subject, there is no clear assertion of notability. The article would have to be completely rewritten from scratch with verifiable sources. Even so, speedy deletion has been declined in the past, so I do not feel comfortable speedily deleting now. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  20:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge / redirect into Judgment Yard's creator, Sizzla. --Lockley (talk) 03:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sizzla - currently lacks evidence of independent notability; can always be recreated as a separate article later if sources are found. Terraxos (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.