Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgeship of Rayagada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Judgeship of Rayagada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable list of people who have been judges in a district-level court in India. Judges are appointed by the committees which in-directly can be said to be from Supreme Court. The positions are not filled by public voting and do not qualify with the logic of lets say WP:NPOL. All references are self-published and topic does not pass WP:GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Also nominating similar articles:

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Judgeship of Rayagada relates to a judicial infrastructure and its notability need not be decided from the list of Judges but from the fact that it is an important wing of Judicial Administration relating to Indian Courts. Topics like educational institutions are there in wikipedia. I do not say that educational institutions are not notable, but judicial institutions are notable owing to their becoming one of the four pillars of democracy. That's why Bankshall Court, West Bengal Judicial Academy have been there in Wikipedia. I feel sorry to say that when it is a matter relating to institutions in a backward state like Odisha, its apparent notability is being questioned. I do strongly appeal for reconsideration.Hpsatapathy (talk) 07:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I would thank that the matter has been kept open for more views. In this regard I would like to place one more point that the List_of_district_courts_in_India contain red links which are meant to help Wikipedia grow. Certainly the creation of red links prevents new pages from being orphaned from the start. So when such a red link is developed, it is certainly in consonance with the policy of wikipedia and the purpose is only to enrich Wikipedia with more relevant topics.Hpsatapathy (talk) 10:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Neither of the (apparent) "keep" !votes appears to be policy-based. Relisting to get more views.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * How are the courts in Rayagada any different from those in other nearly 700 places in India? I have not questioned notability of these articles because they fall in Odisha. I would do same with Maharashtrian courts. Not all entries in any list are supposed to have an individual article. We haven't applied that logic on List of songs by Lata Mangeshkar. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. - Sitush (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, and User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.