Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judi Cohen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Judi Cohen
Not sure whether this meets WP:BIO or not. Comments appreciated. BlackBear 16:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

 Keep I think she passes the so-called test, but getting a few references of the web will really help. The Evil Clown my contributions 16:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as I see no claim to notability and there are no references provided. The burden of proof should be on the creator, not the reader.(sorry, forgot to sign)--killing sparrows 18:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete i dont see any claim of being notable.--Joebengo 22:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete random corporate executive and mid-level bureaucrat seems to fail WP:BIO. Montco 02:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete From the talk pgae "All information provided as a bio is completely varifiable. The purpose of posting a bio is to provide readers with full and accurate information on Board members." I just replied, :Then verify it with some good references. "  We will need to check the others.DGG 08:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No true claim notability and lack of references.   Das Nerd 00:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.