Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judicial Tyranny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was already redirected to Judicial tyranny; if anyone wants to de-POV that and merge it with Judicial activism, that's good too. Angr/ talk 22:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Judicial Tyranny
Appears to be a POV duplication of judicial activism. Not certain enough of this to it, brought it here from NP Patrol for consensus. Hynca-Hooley 21:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete highly POV, all useful material is already covered in judicial activism. JoshuaZ 22:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article and even the title itself are irretrievably POV. As JohuaZ says, the useful material is already elsewhere. Nothing to salvage here. Fan1967 23:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or if anyone can find something worthwhile, merge. Edgar181 23:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Judicial tyranny as it currently stands, and keep Judicial Tyranny as a redirect. I'm content with the modifications by Judge Magney. Edgar181 17:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep in different form (please review). A different form of this article was created in response to a deletion proposal last year, but despite the "keep" vote the closing administrator, with no explanation, effectively deleted the more valid article in favor of redirection. Judge Magney 03:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment My reading of Judicial tyranny (small t) is like my reading of the one with the capital T. It's still awfully POV. I would recommend having both versions redirect to judicial activism, and if someone wants to add a paragraph there explaining the use of this particular term, it would be more appropriate there, within that context. Fan1967 16:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge, redirect, and -POV. Stifle 00:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.