Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Ann Roberts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Judith Ann Roberts

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an article about the victim in a 50-some year old murder case, unsolved. While I'm sure it is important to the family, I can see no way it is encyclopedic or notable. The article makes no claim that it led to anything important, like Amber alert, etc. It sounds like a close copy of a 'true crime' website article. --killing  22:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Notibility is questionable... anyway It doesn't have any sources and so isn't verifiable.--Dacium 00:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and add sources and cleanup Your confusing your own laziness with verifiability. Verifiability is finding references in Google that match info in the article and adding the sources. Any subject can be in Wikipedia if it is covered by at least two other sources. Not every article has to be "crime of the decade" --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 03:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not Crime Library. The majority of this article was a copyright violation from here; I've removed that. --Dhartung | Talk 04:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.