Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Declercq (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete WP:CSD, recreation of a deleted article. The discussion was earlier this year, so there's no good argument that standards have changed, and the differences between this and the deleted version are very minor. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Judith Declercq
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of deleted article that still has the same issues as when it was first deleted. As far as I can tell it is the exact same article, to the point that the duplication detector picked it up on a Wikipedia mirror. A draft was parked in a file description on Commons.

Again, this subject who served as a provincial level administrator in a governmental body does not seem to meet WP:GNG in the fact that she has not been widely covered in reliable sources. The assertion that she is an example of "early emancipation of women" is, at this point, unreferenced commentary. EricSerge (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. EricSerge (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Like the hat, but delete per nom. I'm not finding anything that satisfies WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.