Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Hunt (consultant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Judith Hunt (consultant)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply not notable for Wikipedia Sheroddy (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment. Something seems to have gone wrong here - I wanted to nominate the article about Judith Hunt (consultant) for deletion, not Judith Hunt (illustrator). Could somebody please help me change this as the Cyberbot has nominated the wrong article?--Sheroddy (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I think I've fixed it, the links now go to the correct article. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete -Searches found nothing that could establish notability. ABF99 (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably delete as my searches found nothing good and it hasn't been improved since starting so there's not much to suggest further improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  07:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches on the engines turned up nothing to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.