Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Kaplan Eisenstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Notability has been established, hiccup with formatting quickly fixed. Nev1 (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Judith Kaplan Eisenstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No wiki links. No references. No ext. links. And no categories. ...  Lhealt    (talk)  14:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This is currently being edited during a University of Edinburgh editathon. Please do not delete.EMcAndrew (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The current version seems quite well advanced from when this template went on. We should definitely keep this. Caorongjin (talk) 17:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Jewish Women's Archive bio and the numerous already-cited news obituaries (including those in The New York Times and Chicago Tribune) clearly state the case for her notability in the field of religious music, as well as her landmark role as the first bat mitzvah girl. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- sufficient for GNG; for example, Kaplan's Bat Mitzvah is covered in some detail in The Jewish Life Cycle: Rites of Passage from Biblical to Modern Times. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The breadth and scope of the reliable and verifiable sources about the article's subject rather clearly support her claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 09:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW keep, and a WP:TROUT to the nominator,, for taking this step only two minutes after article creation, at a stage where it was clearly still being worked on by its creator (e.g. placeholders for its references, later filled in). An obituary in the New York Times is automatic notability, even if we didn't have all the other evidence that we do. And merely checking WP:BEFORE should have taken longer than two minutes. Perhaps a withdrawal is in order? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, well referenced article reflects this, oh and a seconder on the trouting, nomination 2mins after appeared is a rediculously short amount of time. ps. please feel free to send me a minnow as i am feeling a bit peckish. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, although without any initial references, nom may feel justified, so the creator,, could have placed a under construction or an active editing tag on it, or done a little more sandbox development before making it live? Coolabahapple (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you all for your support and advice. I wrote the article as part of a 'Women and Religion' editathon with colleagues at University of Edinburgh. I used visual editor to create the page in my sandbox and then copied it across. I did not realise that visual editor would not copy all my refs and links too. I have learned new skills in the process! By the time I figured out what had happened the delete template was already on. I hope the delete nomination can be removed. Thank you. Melissa Highton (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.