Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith McKinlay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mr.weedle (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Judith McKinlay

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article relies on only 1 source. Whilst some publications, no evidence of notability in academia per requirements for academics. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New Zealand. North America1000 05:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added six published reviews of two of her books to the article. There are four articles by others about her work in Bible and Critical Theory 15 (1): 2019, and a panel discussion partially about her described at . I think that's enough for WP:AUTHOR. This article was nominated for deletion less than 20 minutes after its creation, and the nominator's description of what's in the article, rather than what's available more generally, reflects a misunderstanding of notability (specifically WP:ARTN) and a lack of WP:BEFORE. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed on these grounds, appreciate it. Mr.weedle (talk) 06:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.