Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Orloff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 12:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Judith Orloff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poor sourcing. Unreliable sources. Questionable notability. Famous dog   (c) 12:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, speedy close. Best-selling author, many indications of notability, apparently meets the GNG. Cursory nomination statement simply makes no case. Article is suboptimal but makes a sufficient case for notability .The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. The tone is little bit promotional here and there, and like most articles it could stand some editing, but as Hullaballoo says, her notability as an author is demonstrated by what's already there. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per Hullaballoo. No case for deletion. Lepricavark (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.