Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Chapman (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Judy Chapman (writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer, which just states that she exists and doesn't offer any evidence that her existence would pass a WP:AUTHOR criterion. It's not based on adequate reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG either; between the single reference and the contextless linkfarm of external links, there are two articles which just namecheck her existence as a giver of soundbite, two articles where she's the bylined author and not the subject, and just one link that might count for anything at all toward notability as it's an actual critical review of her book. But it takes more than just one acceptable source to pass GNG if a person doesn't have a clean AUTHOR pass. For added bonus, this was initially written as a straight copyvio of her own website, raising conflict of interest concerns. There's just not enough substance here, or enough reliable source coverage about her, to deem her notable. Bearcat (talk) 19:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - doesn't look like she meets WP:AUTHOR.PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC. My Singapore Lover, publisher Monsoon Books, revidwed in teh online version of the Toronto Star]] here: a search for her book in gNews comes up empty, but a search on her name brought up a mention in the Quad-City Times, she has a story in an anthology by a local publisher.  WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * delete thought I'd opined B4. Does not meet GNG or author criteria. Perhaps one day she will. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON, didn't pass even basic WP:GNG nor WP:AUTHOR her profession &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 10:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing even close to showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW for lack of reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.