Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Dodge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Judy Dodge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

County-level official who fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, all sources are primary. GPL93 (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Ruyaba   (talk)  00:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Ruyaba   (talk)  00:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NPOL, and a scan for other reliable sources shows only routine local coverage related to her political office without significant independent coverage. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 03:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Montgomery County, Ohio elections or delete; doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines valereee (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. County commissioners are not handed an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist — at this level of government, the notability test is the ability to show a depth and range and volume of reliable source media coverage that marks her out as a special notability case of significantly greater notability than most other county commissioners. But this shows nothing of the sort at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability outside of her office, which is in itself not notable. Britishfinance (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL, no coverage outside office. --GRuban (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.