Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Minx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. With sources, consensus is that the subject meets the general notability guideline and WP:PORNBIO. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 10:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Judy Minx

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of notability of this pornographic actress. Thine  Antique   Pen   (public)  20:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - I have added some sources so please keep the article and remove Article for deletion template, thank you. Ramesh Ramaiah   talk  02:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I am leaving this discussion open. Thine   Antique   Pen   (public)  13:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - decent coverage by multiple reliable sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per passing WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:PORNBIO. Not just a pornographic actress, she appears to be a fairly well known public figure in France. She received enough reliable coverage to pass GNG, including a quite satisfying biographic article on Libération (I have added to the article). She also starred on several mainstream films in significant roles. Notable. Cavarrone (talk) 06:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, but keep nonetheless - Does not pass #1 or #2 of the notability guidelines for porn stars; however, being mentioned numerous times in the mainstream media covers #3 of the guidelines. Also, the fact that she was in a documentary about the profession shows notability as well and carries quite a bit of weight (IMO). --MalcomMarcomb11376 (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.