Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jugend- und Auszubildendenvertretung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy withdrawn. Just looked on JSTOR and I think there's enough to pass GNG. (non-admin closure)  Dr Strauss   talk   20:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Jugend- und Auszubildendenvertretung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find little significant coverage in English or German sources to suggest passing WP:NORG.  Dr Strauss   talk   16:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep I wonder if the nominator has really looked at the German version, which is much fuller, and has a wide range of sources. This includes three German books that seem to deal entirely or in very large part with the subject. How this cannot be considered significant coverage puzzles me--we niormally AGF about printed sources if they seem plausible.  DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * can you read German? Because I sure can and the stuff there amounts to passing mentions and affiliated sources only.  We don't just keep stuff on the assumption that it's notable because it's in a foreign language so sources might exist.    Dr Strauss   talk   22:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you can read German then how did you fail to spot the many reliable sources with significant coverage found by the Google Books and Scholar searches linked as part of the nomination process? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 *  Dr Strauss   talk   12:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Stop being so obtuse and just look at the first few of the Google Books results. There are whole books there about this topic. These completely unresearched deletion nominations are becoming disruptive. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you look at my AfD stats more often than not I get the result right. It's neither obtuse nor disruptive.  If you think I'm being disruptive, take me to WP:ANI.  You've cast enough asperations in my direction over the past few weeks, such as the racism accusations, albeit now stricken; if you don't stop, I'll be taking you there.    Dr Strauss   talk   13:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, obviously, per the extensive coverage in reliable sources found by simply clicking on "books" or "scholar" above. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 16:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. It looks like several entire German academic books are devoted to this subject, without looking at those that deal with it in the context of other primary topics. Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.