Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jugu Abraham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Jugu Abraham

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable author created by single-purpose editor, who also created a number of unlikely redirects to this article. Most of edit history is actually on Jugu John Abraham. If kept, that history should be moved to this article&mdash;I'm holding off on initiating that pending this AfD. / edg ☺ ☭ 15:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete 1 - I can't find him on the link mentioned as his imdb profile, I can't find him on imdb either. Every other reference is a employer profile, travel itinerary or program schedule except for a couple of published movie reviews. Clearly NOTWP:N. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 06:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And lest we forget, each redirect which was a regular page before should be bulked in with this AfD and probably salted. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above-referenced redirects:
 * In this instance, salting seems like overkill to me. Some of these phrases, and indeed Mr. Abraham could merit an article some day. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, I said salting because of the number of implausible redirects that have been created for this, it just gives a very funny feeling. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * While the redirects suggest aggressive promotion, I can imagine all this as possibly a good faith effort. All editing by occurred within a 2 week period, with no edits in over a month. If there were a recurrence, then I would support salting. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * In this instance, salting seems like overkill to me. Some of these phrases, and indeed Mr. Abraham could merit an article some day. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, I said salting because of the number of implausible redirects that have been created for this, it just gives a very funny feeling. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * While the redirects suggest aggressive promotion, I can imagine all this as possibly a good faith effort. All editing by occurred within a 2 week period, with no edits in over a month. If there were a recurrence, then I would support salting. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * In this instance, salting seems like overkill to me. Some of these phrases, and indeed Mr. Abraham could merit an article some day. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, I said salting because of the number of implausible redirects that have been created for this, it just gives a very funny feeling. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * While the redirects suggest aggressive promotion, I can imagine all this as possibly a good faith effort. All editing by occurred within a 2 week period, with no edits in over a month. If there were a recurrence, then I would support salting. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * While the redirects suggest aggressive promotion, I can imagine all this as possibly a good faith effort. All editing by occurred within a 2 week period, with no edits in over a month. If there were a recurrence, then I would support salting. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I am not convinced by the quality of the sourcing. For example, the first source is a book which mentions the subject's name only in the preface. The other sources are mostly related to subject and thus are not independent. I strongly feel that this is a case of very aggressive promotion. Salih  ( talk ) 05:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.