Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicy bits first


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was MERGE to Tom Gilb. Owen&times; &#9742;  16:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Juicy bits first
If it's not a hoax, it's certainly non-notable. You can call me Al 20:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC) ''Note: relisting 13 December 2005. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)''
 * Merge with Tom Gilb. GeeCee 21:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-noteable. Of the 280 hits on Google, almost none of them had anything to do with programming.  HackJandy 21:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Tom Gilb. Wikipedia is not a repository of management / product development catchphrases.  Jkelly 00:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge but do not redirect. Stifle 13:48, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Pareto analysis Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Tom Gilb or Agile Programming. Jasmol 21:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.