Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juju Noda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Juju Noda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While the subject may have coverage in some topic-specific media, a 14-year-old Formula 4 driver is hardly notable enough for encyclopaedic inclusion. Hundreds, if not low thousands of drivers compete in Formula 4 and other junior series every year and many have received greater coverage off of more notable achievements. I don't see what qualifies Noda as notable enough for an article other than a short burst of attention at her first Danish F4 race and a handful of articles commentating on her aspirations, which does not meet the requirement for significant coverage, and most certainly does not meet the motorsport notability guidelines. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 08:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * There are very few young female motorsport drivers. The deletion of this page, which highlights an incredible young prospect who is already achieving great success, is tantamount to the suppression of gender equality that is widespread across the motorsport community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrPaperwings (talk • contribs) 15:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a platform for social advocacy. The subject is not notable based off of a single Danish F4 race. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 22:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete the purpose of Wikipedia is not to right perceived wrongs. We should doubly not be doing it by over publicizing minors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Extra comment: The article also appears to fail the WP:YOUNGATH notability guideline, as most sources used on the article are either extremely short articles that essentially say "this happened" with no further detail (e.g. 1, e.g. 2, e.g. 3) or only make brief mention of her (e.g. 1, e.g. 2). 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 06:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 18:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. No coverage beyond routine mentions. A case of NOTINHERITED and TOOSOON. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per nom. does not meet notability. Alex-h (talk) 19:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.